BF
B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 was weak: net sales fell 10.5% to $425.4M, adjusted EBITDA dropped 21.2% to $59.1M, and adjusted EPS was $0.04; drivers included retailer destocking (
$15M), Easter timing shift ($8M), and heavier trade promotion, particularly at Green Giant . - Versus Wall Street (S&P Global) consensus: BGS missed on revenue ($425.4M vs $459.3M*), adjusted EBITDA ($59.1M vs $70.5M*), and adjusted EPS ($0.04 vs $0.155*) for Q1 2025; Q4 2024 had a modest top-line and EPS beat but a slight EBITDA miss* .
- Guidance cut: FY25 net sales lowered to $1.86–$1.91B (from $1.89–$1.95B), adjusted EBITDA to $280–$290M (from $290–$300M), and adjusted EPS to $0.55–$0.65 (from $0.65–$0.75); non-operational items (interest, D&A, tax rate, capex) were maintained .
- Management is accelerating portfolio reshaping and cost actions (targeting ~$10M in FY25 savings; $15–$20M run-rate) and reiterated strategic review of Frozen & Vegetables; they later sold Don Pepino & Sclafani to reduce debt .
- Near-term stock reaction was “more dramatic than expected,” with catalysts including the guidance cut, Green Giant promotional investment and margin compression; April trends showed stabilization (consumption -2% to -3%) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Cash generation strengthened: cash from operations rose to $52.7M in Q1 (vs $35.1M in Q1’24) .
- Spices & Flavor Solutions and Canadian Frozen performed resiliently; Frozen & Vegetables in Canada drove mid-single-digit net sales growth despite FX headwinds .
- Management tone on stabilization: “recent net sales in March, April and early May have begun to show stabilizing trends versus last year” (Casey Keller) ; April net sales down only ~2% with Green Giant showing strength .
What Went Wrong
- Significant quarterly miss vs consensus: revenue ($425.4M vs $459.3M*), adjusted EBITDA ($59.1M vs $70.5M*), adjusted EPS ($0.04 vs $0.155*) .
- Frozen & Vegetables segment EBITDA turned negative (-$1.5M), impacted by stepped-up trade promotion, elevated pack costs for corn and peas, and lower net pricing .
- SG&A intensity rose to 11.6% of sales (10.2% LY) due to higher non-recurring/acquisition-related expenses, offset by lower marketing and selling spend .
Financial Results
Headline results vs prior quarters
vs S&P Global consensus (context)
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Segment breakdown (Q1 2025)
KPIs (Q1 2025)
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Our first quarter results reflect the challenging environment … including the impact of retailer inventory reductions and a shift in Easter timing into the second quarter.” — Casey Keller .
- “Adjusted EBITDA was down $15.9 million … reflecting lower net sales … and increased costs and investment in the Green Giant U.S. business.” — Casey Keller .
- “Promotional trade spends … increased by approximately 175 basis points … driving … decrease in our gross profit and … adjusted gross profit as a percentage of net sales.” — Bruce Wacha .
- “We have implemented efforts to reduce operating and overhead costs … expect to deliver $10 million in projected savings this year with an annual run rate of $15 million to $20 million.” — Casey Keller .
- “We remain committed to reshaping and restructuring our portfolio … [including] possible divestiture … of Frozen & Vegetables.” — Casey Keller .
Q&A Highlights
- Tariffs exposure and contingency planning: Management flagged spices sourcing (Vietnam/China) as biggest risk; Green Giant manufacturing in Mexico/Canada is USMCA-compliant; guidance excludes tariff impacts .
- Retailer inventory reductions: Viewed as largely permanent efficiency shift; majority occurred in late January/February .
- Promotional strategy: Short-term heavier promotions (Green Giant) to restore competitiveness; pulling back as trends improve .
- Liquidity and revolver: Revolver is cash flow-based; a couple hundred million available on $475M facility .
- Stock reaction and acceleration of actions: Management already accelerating portfolio/cost moves; the day’s market reaction reinforced urgency .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 misses: Revenue $425.4M vs $459.3M* (miss), adjusted EBITDA $59.1M vs $70.5M* (miss), adjusted EPS $0.04 vs $0.155* (miss) .
- Q4 2024 context: Revenue $551.6M vs $547.95M* (beat), adjusted EPS $0.31 vs $0.301* (beat), adjusted EBITDA $83.7M vs $85.1M* (slight miss) .
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near-term narrative: Retailer destocking, Easter timing, and stepped-up trade spend drove Q1 miss and guidance cut; watch for normalization of promotions and consumption stabilization through Q2–Q3 .
- Green Giant remains the pressure point; segment EBITDA turned negative in Q1; improvements are expected with lower pack costs starting in Q4 and reduced promotions, but strategic review adds execution uncertainty .
- Cost discipline is actionable: ~$10M FY25 savings targeted (run-rate $15–$20M) should help margins in H2 amid FX tailwinds (USD/MXN) and more modest input inflation .
- Balance sheet/risk: Net debt ~$1.97B; ~35% floating-rate exposure; 100 bps rate cut would save ~$7M interest annually — leverage reduction depends on divestitures and cash generation .
- Guidance downside is bounded by maintained interest/D&A/tax assumptions; top-line and EBITDA ranges now reflect slower H1 and partial 53rd week benefit in Q4 .
- Portfolio reshaping is a central catalyst: Ongoing review of Frozen & Vegetables; post-Q1 sale of Don Pepino & Sclafani demonstrates debt-reduction focus .
- Dividend continuity maintained: $0.19/share declared for Q2, supporting income profile amidst transformation, but dependent on cash flow and leverage trajectory .